<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:slims="http://slims.web.id" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3" ID="31659">
<titleInfo>
<title>An Analysis of 
Rhetorical Moves in the Introductions of Undergraduate Theses at the English 
Education Department of the State Islamic University Sultan Maulana 
Hasanuddin Banten</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="Personal Name" authority="">
<namePart>Nurul Hijah Iliatul Aulia</namePart>
<role><roleTerm type="text">Primary Author</roleTerm></role>
</name>
<typeOfResource manuscript="yes" collection="yes">mixed material</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">bibliography</genre>
<originInfo>
<place><placeTerm type="text">Serang Banten</placeTerm></place>
<publisher></publisher>
<dateIssued>2025</dateIssued>
<issuance>monographic</issuance>
<edition></edition>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code">en</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="text">English</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription>
<form authority="gmd">Text</form>
<extent>xv + 63 hlm.; 18 x 25 cm</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<note>Writing the introduction section of an undergraduate thesis is one of the most 
challenging tasks for students, as it requires the ability to organize ideas, 
provide background information, and justify the significance of the study. 
This research aims to analyse the rhetorical moves employed in the 
introduction sections of undergraduate theses written by students of the 
English Education Department at the State Islamic University of Sultan 
Maulana Hasanuddin Banten. Specifically, the study identifies the rhetorical 
moves used, explores the challenges faced by students, and examines the 
common mistakes in applying these moves. This study employed a qualitative 
content analysis method by analysing 30 undergraduate theses using Swales’ 
(1990) Create A Research Space (CARS) model as the analytical framework. 
The findings revealed that Move 1 (Establishing a Territory) and Move 3 
(Presenting the Present Work) were the most frequently employed, while 
Move 2 (Establishing a Niche) appeared less frequently and was often 
underdeveloped. The main challenges faced by students included difficulties 
in articulating research gaps, limited academic vocabulary, weak transitions, 
and lack of argumentative writing. Common mistakes identified were 
omission of Move 2, vague research objectives, redundancy in Move 1, and 
weak rhetorical flow. These results indicate that although students are 
generally able to introduce the topic and state the purpose of their research, 
they struggle to establish a clear research gap and present their study 
persuasively. This study suggests the need for explicit instruction in academic 
writing, particularly in applying the CARS model, to improve the quality of 
thesis introductions in Islamic higher education institutions.</note>
<classification>820</classification><identifier type="isbn"></identifier><location>
<physicalLocation>UIN SMH Banten Perpustakaan Pusat</physicalLocation>
<shelfLocator>SKRIPSI TBI 2599</shelfLocator>
<holdingSimple>
<copyInformation>
<numerationAndChronology type="1">SKRIPSI TBI 2599</numerationAndChronology>
<sublocation>My Library</sublocation>
<shelfLocator>SKRIPSI TBI 2599</shelfLocator>
</copyInformation>
</holdingSimple>
</location>
<recordInfo>
<recordIdentifier>31659</recordIdentifier>
<recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2026-04-15 12:49:02</recordCreationDate>
<recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2026-04-15 12:49:51</recordChangeDate>
<recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo></mods></modsCollection>