<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<modsCollection xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:slims="http://slims.web.id" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
<mods version="3.3" ID="27024">
<titleInfo>
<title>An Analysis of Students Writing on Personal Experiences on Twitter (A Qualitative Descriptive at the Tenth Grade of SMKN 3 Kota Serang)</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="Personal Name" authority="">
<namePart>Sucita Ramdani</namePart>
<role><roleTerm type="text">Primary Author</roleTerm></role>
</name>
<typeOfResource manuscript="yes" collection="yes">mixed material</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="marcgt">bibliography</genre>
<originInfo>
<place><placeTerm type="text">serang</placeTerm></place>
<publisher></publisher>
<dateIssued>2023</dateIssued>
<issuance>monographic</issuance>
<edition></edition>
</originInfo>
<language>
<languageTerm type="code">en</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="text">English</languageTerm>
</language>
<physicalDescription>
<form authority="gmd">Text</form>
<extent>xvi + 109 hlm.; 18 x 25 cm</extent>
</physicalDescription>
<note>This research to analyze students' writing about recount text threads 
on Twitter. This research was to find out how is students’ quality recount 
text and to find out how can thread Twitter help students’ writing recount 
text better. This research used qualitative descriptive methods. The 
instruments used in this study were documentation and rubric. The research 
subjects were 5 students’ from class X DKV1 SMKN 3 Kota Serang who 
wrote personal experiences on Twitter threads. To analyze the data, the 
researcher identified errors in students' essay writing which were categorized 
according to the Jacobs et al. and placing scores in the writing score criteria 
table. 
The results showed that students' writing skills were at the Excellent 
level with an average score of 82.2. Based on the table rubric, 1 out of 5 
aspects of student writing is at the Excellent To Very Good level, this aspect 
is organization with an average score of (19.2). While 3 aspects are included 
in the Good To Average level, namely Content (25), Language Use (18.6), 
and Vocabulary (15.6). Then, the results of the analysis show that students 
make the most mistakes in terms of mechanics with an average score of (3.8)
and at the Fair To Poor level. Furthermore, Twitter threads can help students 
write recount text well from step-by-step threads that help students make it 
easier to write generic structure recount text. Twitter thread media in writing 
recount text also makes student work visible to others.</note>
<classification>428</classification><identifier type="isbn"></identifier><location>
<physicalLocation>UIN SMH Banten Perpustakaan Pusat</physicalLocation>
<shelfLocator>SKRIPSI TBI 2316</shelfLocator>
<holdingSimple>
<copyInformation>
<numerationAndChronology type="1">SKRIPSI TBI 2316</numerationAndChronology>
<sublocation>My Library</sublocation>
<shelfLocator>SKRIPSI TBI 2316</shelfLocator>
</copyInformation>
</holdingSimple>
</location>
<recordInfo>
<recordIdentifier>27024</recordIdentifier>
<recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2023-09-18 09:53:27</recordCreationDate>
<recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2023-09-18 09:53:42</recordChangeDate>
<recordOrigin>machine generated</recordOrigin>
</recordInfo></mods></modsCollection>